On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:20:42AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:50:32 +1000 David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:Ok. Well go ahead and apply then, if you have no additional revisions to suggest. -- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibsonOn Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:28:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:It's trivial, just a bit of fuzz on 1/6, no need as far as I'm concerned.On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 07:20:17AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:Actually, never mind. I discovered I hadn't rebased onto the latest and there's a conflict, so I'll respin anyway.On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:52:19 +1000 David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > @@ -164,17 +164,17 @@ struct flow_common { > > /** > * struct flow_sidx - ID for one side of a specific flow > - * @side: Side referenced (0 or 1) > + * @side: Index of side referenced (0 or 1) > * @flow: Index of flow referenced Nit (I can fix this up on merge, and I didn't finish reviewing yet): the comment to the struct should also use sidei/flowi.If this is the only issue, go ahead and fix on merge. If there are any more nits I'll make a new spin.