On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:We take care of this in nl_addr_dup(): if the interface index associated to an address doesn't match the selected host interface (ifa->ifa_index != ifi_src), we don't copy that address. But for routes, we just unconditionally update the interface index to match the index in the target namespace, even if the source interface didn't match. This might happen in two cases: with a pre-4.20 kernel without support for NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK, which won't filter routes based on the interface we pass in the request, as reported by runsisi, and any kernel with support for multipath routes where any of the nexthops refers to an unrelated host interface. In both cases, check the index of the source interface, and avoid copying unrelated routes. Reported-by: runsisi <runsisi(a)hust.edu.cn> Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=86 Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com> --- netlink.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/netlink.c b/netlink.c index a5a4870..e8325c7 100644 --- a/netlink.c +++ b/netlink.c @@ -554,21 +554,32 @@ int nl_route_dup(int s_src, unsigned int ifi_src, NLMSG_OK(nh, left) && (status = nl_status(nh, left, seq)) > 0; nh = NLMSG_NEXT(nh, left)) { struct rtmsg *rtm = (struct rtmsg *)NLMSG_DATA(nh); + bool discard = false; struct rtattr *rta; size_t na; if (nh->nlmsg_type != RTM_NEWROUTE) continue; - dup_routes++; - for (rta = RTM_RTA(rtm), na = RTM_PAYLOAD(nh); RTA_OK(rta, na); rta = RTA_NEXT(rta, na)) { /* RTA_OIF and RTA_MULTIPATH attributes carry the - * identifier of a host interface. Change them to match - * the corresponding identifier in the target namespace. - */ + * identifier of a host interface. If they match the + * host interface we're copying from, change them to + * match the corresponding identifier in the target + * namespace. + * + * If RTA_OIF doesn't match (NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK not + * available), or if any interface index in nexthop + * objects differ from the host interface, discard the + * route altogether. + */ if (rta->rta_type == RTA_OIF) { + if (*(unsigned int *)RTA_DATA(rta) != ifi_src) { + discard = true; + break; + } + *(unsigned int *)RTA_DATA(rta) = ifi_dst; } else if (rta->rta_type == RTA_MULTIPATH) { size_t nh_len = RTA_PAYLOAD(rta); @@ -576,8 +587,19 @@ int nl_route_dup(int s_src, unsigned int ifi_src, for (rtnh = (struct rtnexthop *)RTA_DATA(rta); RTNH_OK(rtnh, nh_len); - rtnh = RTNH_NEXT_AND_DEC(rtnh, nh_len)) + rtnh = RTNH_NEXT_AND_DEC(rtnh, nh_len)) { + int src = (int)ifi_src; + + if (rtnh->rtnh_ifindex != src) { + discard = true; + break; + } + rtnh->rtnh_ifindex = ifi_dst; + } + + if (discard) + break; } else if (rta->rta_type == RTA_PREFSRC) { /* Host routes might include a preferred source * address, which must be one of the host's @@ -588,6 +610,11 @@ int nl_route_dup(int s_src, unsigned int ifi_src, rta->rta_type = RTA_UNSPEC; } } + + if (discard) + rtm->rtm_family = AF_UNSPEC;Sorry, I misremembered by constants. Rather than using AF_UNSPEC, I was thinking you could change nh->nlmsg_type to NLMSG_NOOP, that way..+ else + dup_routes++; } if (!NLMSG_OK(nh, left)) { @@ -619,10 +646,12 @@ int nl_route_dup(int s_src, unsigned int ifi_src, for (nh = (struct nlmsghdr *)buf, left = nlmsgs_size; NLMSG_OK(nh, left); nh = NLMSG_NEXT(nh, left)) { + struct rtmsg *rtm = (struct rtmsg *)NLMSG_DATA(nh); uint16_t flags = nh->nlmsg_flags; int rc; - if (nh->nlmsg_type != RTM_NEWROUTE) + if (nh->nlmsg_type != RTM_NEWROUTE || + rtm->rtm_family == AF_UNSPEC).. you don't need to update the condition here.continue; rc = nl_do(s_dst, nh, RTM_NEWROUTE,-- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson