On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:03:59 +0100
Laurent Vivier <lvivier(a)redhat.com> wrote:
v11:
- rebase
- address comments from David on v10
Are my comments from before v10 and the peek_offset_cap issue addressed
now, or should I rather wait reviewing this? Or should I have another
look at that issue...?
Wait. I will address your comments in the next version. I will work on the peek_offset_cap
issue once the code is stabilized (so the next next version?).
Thanks,
Laurent
v10:
- rebase v9 on top of my changes
- remove last 4 patches from v9 as
'tcp: Pass TCP header and payload separately to tcp_fill_headers[46]()'
introduces a regression in "make check" for me.
- addressed comments from David
- I tried to cleanup iov management, but I was not able to remove the
update of the first iov to point to the header or to the data
- upd_vu_hdrlen()/tcp_vu_hdrlen() includes now the size of the
virtio-net header
- I didn't address comments from Stefano.
- I didn't fix the bug with seek_offset_cap