Re: [PATCH 5/5] pesto: Introduce stub configuration interface and tool

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 10:36:29AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:

On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:48:50 +1100 David Gibson wrote:

...

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 01:02:46AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:

...

[...]

Note: we should remember to tackle your own comments from , eventually (not necessarily now, but fd_conf just reminded me).

Uh, don't remember what that mail was and I'm not immediately sure how to search for it based on message-id.

No need to search, we use public-inbox, so:

https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/aYqw6M2G9n-tv9Qm@zatzit

(or, at least in claws-mail, select "Extended" in the search box, then 'i MSG_ID').

I was including techniques like that under the broad category of "search". I assumed there was an easy way, I just didn't know what it was. I think I addressed most of my comments there already, but I should go back through and double check.

...

...

...

[...]

+++ b/pesto.1 @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +.\" SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +.\" Copyright Red Hat +.\" Author: David Gibson +.TH pesto 1 + +.SH NAME +.B pesto +\- View or alter configuration of a running \fBpasst\fR(1) or +\fBpasta\fR(1).

...process/instance?

I had that initially, but I was trying to keep it to one line.

Ah, oops, I see. On the other hand:

\- Configure a running \fBpasst\fR(1) or \fBpasta\fR(1) instance.

Nice, done.

fits on one line. Whatever, both are fine by me, i just thought you forgot a word.

-- Stefano

-- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson